hit counter for tumblr
Your browser (Internet Explorer 6) is out of date. It has known security flaws and may not display all features of this and other websites. Learn how to update your browser.
X
Post

Nevada Taverns or Slots Parlors: The Gaming War of this Roses

Nevada Taverns or Slots Parlors: The Gaming War of this Roses

Nevada Gaming Commissioner John Moran Jr. questions an attorney during a commission meeting

The entire point of gaming regulation is to supply a solid, dependable and clear framework from which those in the video gaming industry can run. So Nevada Gaming Commission members were none too happy when regulations they put set up only 2 yrs ago, in 2011, regarding how slots can operate in Nevada’s tavern environment, were back in front of them at a current meeting.

Regulation 3.015 ended up being back to roost, and laying some eggs.

Unhappy to Revisit Rules and Regs

Gaming Commission Chairman Pete Bernhard allow it be known he was none too happy to see the regulatory issue straight back in front of the commission.

‘ We do not wish to see the guidelines changed every two years. One of the worst things regulators can do is provide uncertainty. I thought we resolved this presssing problem in 2011,’ Bernhard reiterated.

Creating the revisitation were two different sets of laws from two different regulatory figures, each overlapping the other and creating a set that is murky of for tavern owners to abide by.

Regarding the one hand, Regulation 3.015 ( appears like a James Bond operative code name) was made by the Commission to make slot parlors illegal; the type exemplified by the plethora of Dottie’s chains found throughout the Las Vegas valley. Rival business operators, because well while the Nevada Resort Association a lobbying group that pushes for its casino clients came ultimately back saying that Dottie’s and their ilk were not really ‘taverns,’ but slot that is small parlors that offered a smattering of desserts and a minimal bar simply so they could pass muster with regulators. More…

Post

Nevada Taverns or Slots Parlors: The Gaming War for the Roses

Nevada Taverns or Slots Parlors: The Gaming War for the Roses

Nevada Gaming Commissioner John Moran Jr. concerns a lawyer during a commission conference

Your whole point of gaming regulation is to supply a solid, dependable and clear framework from which those in the gaming industry can run. So Nevada Gaming Commission members were none too happy when regulations they put set up only couple of years ago, last year, regarding just how slot machines can operate in Nevada’s tavern environment, were back in front of them at a present meeting.

Regulation 3.015 ended up being back to roost, and laying some eggs.

Not Happy to Revisit Guidelines and Regs

Gaming Commission Chairman Pete Bernhard allow it be known he had been none too happy to see the regulatory issue right back in front of the commission.

‘ We don’t wish to see the principles changed every two years. One of the worst things regulators can do is offer uncertainty. We thought we resolved this presssing problem in 2011,’ Bernhard reiterated.

Creating the revisitation were two different sets of laws from two different regulatory figures, each overlapping the other and creating a murky set of rules for tavern owners to abide by.

Regarding the one hand, Regulation 3.015 ( appears like a James Bond code that is operative) was created by the Commission to make slot parlors illegal; the type https://casino-online-australia.net/indian-dreaming-slot-review/ exemplified by the plethora of Dottie’s chains found throughout the Las vegas, nevada valley. Rival business operators, as well once the Nevada Resort Association a lobbying team that pushes for its casino clients came ultimately back saying that Dottie’s and their ilk weren’t really ‘taverns,’ but small slot machine parlors that offered a smattering of treats and a minimal bar simply so they could pass muster with regulators. More…

Post

Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG

A citizens’ anti-gambling initiative has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General

While the continuing state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everyone has been excited about the move. This is exactly why some anti-gambling activists there have actually created a petition so that you can force a statewide vote on whether or not the casino tasks could be able to go ahead.

People who are against the casinos that are new able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the lawyer general’s office. But regrettably for them, the state solicitor however a stop to the move, saying that the ballot question would not be legal beneath the state’s ballot effort process.

Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question

The ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48 under the current state Constitution. That article not just describes the process for getting concern in the ballot, but additionally establishes exactly what can and can not be included in such concerns. One of the guidelines for proposals says that they cannot affect an entity’s ‘right to get compensation for personal property appropriated to public use’.

In accordance with state solicitor Peter Sacks, in the event that concern were to be approved by the public, thus ending the casino deals immediately, it could take the casino developers’ contract rights away with no payment. More…